Sep 28, 2026 · by Leonardo Curtone · View source

FeelMyMac

Lets you feel different textures through your Mac’s trackpad

FeelMyMac

Editorial analysis

The Trackpad Is a Product Surface — and Most Cross-Border Operators Are Ignoring It

Every cross-border seller I know obsesses over the same three surfaces: the listing page, the ad creative, and the unboxing moment. Almost nobody thinks about the fourth surface — the one their own operators touch eight hours a day while they’re inside Seller Central, Shopify admin, or a freight portal. That’s why FeelMyMac caught my attention this week. It’s a macOS app from maker Leonardo Curtone that turns the Mac trackpad’s existing haptic hardware into a texture engine — you feel surfaces, materials, and scroll feedback under your fingers instead of a flat glass slab. On its face, that’s a novelty. For anyone running a lean cross-border team, it’s a small reminder that operator ergonomics is a real line item.

What FeelMyMac Actually Solves (and What It Doesn’t)

Let me be precise about the mechanics, because the pitch is easy to misread. Compatible Mac trackpads already ship with haptic hardware — the same component that fakes the “click” you feel today. FeelMyMac reuses that hardware in a different register: instead of firing only on click, it fires while you move the cursor or scroll, simulating different textures and surfaces. Users can pick materials, tune haptic intensity, and control movement feedback, scrolling feedback, and tap feedback independently. There’s also an optional sound layer, including keyboard sounds.

The maker’s framing is refreshingly honest about scope. In his launch post he says outright that this “isn’t about adding another productivity shortcut or saving you a few clicks” — it’s about changing “how using a computer actually feels.” He also notes the app has already been downloaded hundreds of times and that early feedback has shaped the roadmap. That’s the entire factual footprint: no pricing disclosed, no subscription tier disclosed, no Windows or iPad roadmap disclosed. If you’re the kind of operator who needs an ROI model before installing anything, this product will frustrate you.

Here’s the thing though — the interesting question isn’t whether FeelMyMac saves you money. It’s what it reveals about the gap between hardware capability and software exploitation. Apple shipped haptic trackpads years ago and the ecosystem mostly used them for one trick. A solo maker looked at that and asked why the surface only speaks when you press it. That’s a product-research instinct worth stealing, and I’ll come back to it.

Why Amazon sellers should care more than Shopify ones

If you’re a Shopify DTC operator, your team lives in a browser and a Klaviyo dashboard. Input modality is a rounding error. If you’re an Amazon FBA brand owner, your ops lead is inside Amazon Seller Central reconciling inventory, chasing reimbursements, and toggling between Helium 10 and a spreadsheet. That’s thousands of scroll events a day on a single device. Scroll feedback isn’t cosmetic there — it’s the difference between noticing you’ve scrolled past the row you needed and scrolling past it again. I’m not going to pretend haptics fix reconciliation errors. But the operators doing the highest-volume, lowest-glamour work are exactly the ones who’d benefit from any interface that makes position legible without staring harder.

Where It Sits Against the Existing Options

The honest competitive set here is thin, which is both the opportunity and the warning sign.

On macOS, the closest analogues are utilities like BetterTouchTool, which lets you remap trackpad gestures and bind actions, and Haptic Touch Bar style experiments that tried to make the Touch Bar tactile before Apple killed the Touch Bar. BetterTouchTool is a power-user automation layer — it changes what a gesture does. FeelMyMac changes what a gesture feels like. Those are different jobs, and in practice they’re complementary rather than competitive. If you already run BetterTouchTool, the question is whether adding a sensory layer on top creates cognitive overhead or reduces it. My instinct: for gesture-heavy users, two layers of trackpad customization is one layer too many.

Against Windows laptops, there’s no real comparison — the haptic trackpad hardware simply isn’t there at scale, so this stays a Mac-only story for now. Against Logitech MX-series mice with their own haptic scroll wheels, FeelMyMac is the software answer to a problem Logitech solved in hardware. That’s a meaningful distinction for procurement: one is a $100 peripheral per operator, the other is an app you install on hardware you already own.

The uncomfortable comparison nobody wants to make

The closest thing in spirit isn’t a trackpad tool at all — it’s the whole category of “ambient feedback” software that never found a business model. Think of the graveyard of menu-bar utilities that did one delightful thing and then got abandoned when the developer moved on. FeelMyMac’s maker is clearly still engaged — he’s in the Product Hunt forum actively soliciting feature requests and replying to commenters — but “actively engaged solo maker” and “durable tool your ops team can standardize on” are not the same commitment. If you’re deploying this across a team, you’re betting on one person’s roadmap.

What Cross-Border Sellers Should Actually Borrow From This

Strip away the haptics and there are three transferable lessons for anyone building or buying tools in this industry.

First: audit the surfaces you’ve written off as fixed. Apple treated the trackpad as a click simulator. A maker treated it as a texture canvas. Now map that thinking onto your own stack. Your TikTok Shop order page — is it just a table, or could it surface a “this SKU has a 14% return rate this week” signal inline? Your Temu or SHEIN supplier thread — is it just messages, or could it carry structured lead-time data? Most operators inherit their tooling’s mental model instead of questioning it. The maker here questioned a fifteen-year-old assumption about a piece of hardware.

Second: the “hundreds of downloads” number is the real story. Not because it’s impressive — it isn’t, in absolute terms — but because it’s a reminder that a solo maker can validate a niche that Apple, Logitech, and every accessory brand ignored. If you’re a DTC brand owner, that’s the same asymmetry you exploit when you find a sub-niche the big players won’t touch because the TAM looks too small on a slide. Small is not the same as unviable.

Third: feedback loops beat roadmaps. The maker explicitly says early user feedback “helped shape the app along the way” and that he’s still actively improving it. Compare that to how most cross-border sellers build their own internal tooling — a spec written once, shipped, and never revisited until something breaks. The operators I respect most run their Etsy or eBay workflows the same way: ship a rough version, watch where people hesitate, iterate weekly.

Where the math breaks

I want to be blunt about the failure modes, because I’ve watched too many operators buy into “delightful” tools that quietly cost them money.

The value proposition here is subjective and unquantifiable. There’s no throughput metric, no error-rate reduction, no hours-saved number. For a solo operator who enjoys their machine, that’s fine — you’re buying a small daily quality-of-life improvement, and there’s nothing wrong with that. For a team of twenty, you’re now managing a software dependency with no disclosed pricing, no disclosed support model, and no disclosed enterprise deployment path. That’s a real procurement risk, and any ops manager who’s been burned by an abandoned browser extension knows exactly what I mean.

There’s also a genuine ergonomic question nobody in the launch thread raised: does added haptic feedback on scroll reduce fatigue or add to it? Sensory feedback is not free — it’s cognitive load. For some users, texture under the fingers makes position clearer. For others, it’s a constant low-grade buzz competing for attention. The maker’s own framing — “changing something we rarely think about” — cuts both ways. You rarely think about it because it’s working. Making it noticeable is not automatically an improvement.

What I’d Watch / Test Next

This week, before you install anything, do two things.

First, run a surface audit on your own stack. Pick the three screens your team touches most — for most Amazon FBA sellers that’s Seller Central inventory, your Shopify order queue, and your 3PL’s portal — and write down one assumption each screen makes about how work should flow. Then ask whether that assumption is still true. That exercise costs you an hour and it’s worth more than any app.

Second, if you’re curious about FeelMyMac specifically, treat it as a personal experiment, not a team rollout. Install it on one machine, use it for a full workweek on your highest-scroll task, and note whether your error rate or your fatigue changed. The maker is openly collecting feature requests in the Product Hunt thread, so if you find a workflow gap — say, distinct feedback for spreadsheet row boundaries or for hitting the end of a paginated list — that’s worth posting rather than just lurking.

What I’m watching for: whether the maker ships integrations that make this useful rather than merely pleasant. If a future version can fire distinct haptic signatures on specific UI events — an order flag, an inventory threshold, a failed API call — then this stops being a novelty and starts being an ambient alerting layer for ops teams. That’s the version I’d actually pay for. Until then, it’s a well-executed answer to a question most sellers haven’t thought to ask, and there’s real value in watching how one maker turns a hardware assumption into a product.

Ready to Create Your Own?

Join thousands of brands creating high-performing video ads with VEONIB. No editing skills required.

Start Creating for Free